Waimea |
So, here’s hoping I look a lot better on the 13th
of March than I did at Waimea a few Novembers ago! I would post comparative
pictures, but a) there were, quite mercifully, no photographs taken on that
fateful day at Waimea and b) there WILL be no cameras anywhere near me on the
13th of March.
*****
In the meantime, I wanted to share a few thoughts that came to me
as I commented on student questions a couple weeks ago in my medieval literature
course. My students are fantastic, by
the way, and have managed to make the past few weeks a truly innervating
teaching and learning experience – even though we are only three in
number! One of my students brought up
Eve in a recent comment, referring to her as many tend to do — as arguably the
most negative exemplar for women in medieval iconography, the binary opposite
of the Virgin Mary. In truth, however, Eve’s
treatment in medieval literature, as John Flood has recently observed, is far
more nuanced and – in several cases – more deeply sympathetic than we’d
necessarily assume. My student was
hardly at fault for not realizing this, since the negative portrayal of Eve in
the Middle Ages tends to take the foreground more often than not.
The process of clarifying my student’s understanding of
Eve’s representation in medieval literature, however, got me thinking about
reduction and its imbricated relationship with proximity. It is so much easier to strip away nuance
—from a person, a religion, a culture, etc. — when the object in question is distanced
from the viewer. I’d even go so far as
to say that the farther away you get from an object, the easier this process
becomes. Many pre-postcolonial theorists
who examine medieval literature have noted as much about the treatment of
cultural others in medieval European literature (the work of Sylvia Tomasch
comes immediately to mind), and my dissertation argues, in part, that the stark
binaries that appear in so many Middle English crusades romances are maintained
specifically because of this relationship between proximity and reduction.
The conversation with my student, however, reminded me that
this ability to be reductive by way of distance can also apply to 21st
century perceptions of the Middle Ages. As John Ganim has observed, the Middle
Ages as a time period is both consistently and conspicuously Othered, and
scholars who invest themselves in the study of it will always be at odds with
the reductive approaches that have been endorsed and perpetuated for
centuries. Because of this treatment,
however, studying the Middle Ages can allow students to become more aware of
how we are conditioned— and how we condition ourselves — to consider and quantify
“things in the past.” Perhaps one of our
broader purposes of teaching these dusty tomes, then, is to invite students to
challenge their own tendencies to strip nuance away simply because the object
in question is – and always will be – profoundly alien.